{"id":301,"date":"2020-02-19T16:25:04","date_gmt":"2020-02-19T21:25:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/apexcompliance.net\/blog\/target\/arizona-privacy-legislation-right-left-and-centerish\/"},"modified":"2020-02-21T12:42:12","modified_gmt":"2020-02-21T17:42:12","slug":"arizona-privacy-legislation-right-left-and-centerish","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/apexcompliance.net\/blog\/2020\/02\/19\/arizona-privacy-legislation-right-left-and-centerish\/","title":{"rendered":"Arizona Privacy Legislation"},"content":{"rendered":"
Consumer data privacy appears to be on the minds of legislators in Arizona this session. As previously<\/a> mentioned, House Concurrent Resolution 2013<\/a> was introduced in Arizona on Jan. 10, 2020, by five Republicans and one Democrat declaring:<\/p>\n Not surprisingly, that sentiment was not universally shared and SB 1614<\/a> was introduced on Feb. 5, 2020, by 13 Democrats. The legislation is CCPA Lite, providing consumers the right to know, delete and opt-out of the sale of information. The legislation would apply to a for-profit business that \u201cdoes business in Arizona\u201d and:<\/p>\n Unlike the CCPA and legislation pending in other states, the bill does not provide any GLBA, HIPAA or FCRA exemptions.<\/p>\n In the event of a breach due to the failure to maintain reasonable security measures, a consumer may file suit for statutory damages of $100 to $750 per consumer per incident, or actual damages. A 30-day notice and opportunity to cure provision is included but only applies to an action for statutory damages and does not apply if the action is for \u201cactual pecuniary damages.\u201d The attorney general would be authorized to seek civil penalties up to $7,500 per violation.<\/p>\n […]<\/p>\n This is an excerpt.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n Click here to view full original article at www.lexology.com<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Consumer data privacy appears to be on the minds of legislators in Arizona this session. As previously<\/a> mentioned, House Concurrent Resolution 2013<\/a> was introduced in Arizona on Jan. 10, 2020, by five Republicans and one Democrat declaring:<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n